Make the following sentences interrogative and negative:
1.A decided case constitutes a precedent.
2.In his decision the judge has used a process of analogy.
3.The common law was built up by generations of judges.
4.The King exercised his personal power of justice.
1. Adecided case doesnt constitute a precedent.
2. In hisdecision the judge hasnt used a process of analogy.
3. Thecommon law wasnt built up by generations of judges.
4. The Kingdidnt exercise his personal power of justice.
1. Does adecided case constitute a precedent?
2. Has thejudge used a process of analogy in his decision?
3. Was thecommon law built up by generations of judges?
4. Did theKing exercise his personal power of justice?
Оцени ответ
Подпишись на наш канал в телеграм. Там мы даём ещё больше полезной информации для школьников!
